|
|
Iran eager to establish friendly relations with all nations: Ahmadinejad
By: MehrNews on: 26.11.2005 [19:30 ] (1036 reads)
|
Tehran 26.11.2005, 21.28 (MNA)
|
|
(2658 bytes) [nc]
|
|
Temporary offline
by jouna on 26.11.2005 [20:38 ]
|
|
|
I thank You for your generous offer.
As I trust You keep your word, my friendship is yours, too.
Yours Sincerely,
jouna
|
by jouna on 26.11.2005 [20:47 ]
|
|
|
My warmest thanks for your outstanding effort today
It has been a priviledge to work with you.
Truely Yours,
jouna
|
by BlackPanther on 27.11.2005 [04:21 ]
|
|
|
Addressing the enemies of the Iranian nation, he said, “In the name of freedom, you support the most inhumane governments and allow your security forces to shoot innocent people. Therefore, we accuse you because we have a long list of your crimes and would announce them at any tribunal.”
“The Iranian Basiji nation is a good model for all the world’s liberated countries. The world’s nations will no longer let you be the standard-bearers of human rights, while you are actually involved in many horrible crimes.”
I can see why the West vilifies Ahmadinejad. He has the guts to challenge them not only on individual issues (like the Nuke issue) but more importantly to confront the foundational lies (like Freedom and Human Rights) upon which their nations are based.
In short, he is questoning the very moral and political (il)legitimacy of the imperialist enemy as nation states.
From the enemy's perspective this is Ahmadinejad's true (thought) crime, as it has the political potential to:
1. Politically awaken ordinary citizens in other Developing nations, who have been effectively brainwashed throughout the Cold War and afterwards into believing the great lies of the Free World.
2. Embolden these people to adopt a much less appeasement-oriented stance towards the USA and Europeans in general.
And nothing frightens the West more than the thought of Third Word "natives" standing up, including those immigrant "natives" within their own borders.
You can hear similar comments to Ahmadinejad's speech from leaders like Fidel Castro, Hugo Chavez, and Alexander Lukashenko.
All these leaders (and their nations) are also on the Western hitlist. This is purely coincidental of course. ;)
|
by jouna on 27.11.2005 [08:32 ]
|
|
|
I’m glad you took up this issue. Now, let me pose the following question:
What is is common with all the enemies of the United States of the America?
Or to be more precise (with some precise targets),
WHAT IS COMMON E.G. WITH RUSSIA, CHINA, KOREA, VIETNAM, CUBA, SERBIA, AFGHANISTAN, IRAQ, VENEZUELA?
Forget the ‘communism’, forget the ‘terrorism’.
The Answer is very simple:
THE ENEMIES OF THE UNITED STATES ARE NATIONALISTS IN A SIMPLE, AND JUSTIFIED MANNER, THINKING THAT THE LAND THEY WERE BORN, THE LAND WHERE THEY LIVE, AND IT’S NATURAL RESOURCES BELONGS TO THEM AND THE PEOPLE LIVING AND OWNING IT.
Why is this so horrible for the United States? Again it’s simple: because
IF SOMETHING BELONGS TO THE PEOPLE OF THE COUNTRY, IT DOES NOT BELONG TO THE UNITED STATES OF THE AMERICA. THIS CAN’T BE. IT WILL NOT DO. BECAUSE THERE’S NO FREE AMERICAN ENTERPRISE (TRANSLATION: LOOTING) AFTER THAT.
This is why they targeted the ‘Soviet Union’ from the very beginnning, and soon after China and all the others. It was so in Vietnam, whe’re Ho Chi Minh was first and foremost, a nationalist. So is Mr Castro in Cuba. So was Saddam Hussein. So is Mr Ahmadinejad. And so is Mr Chávez. This is IT.
|
by jouna on 27.11.2005 [09:42 ]
|
|
|
Dear Sir.
It certainly seems that you are a man of honour.
It is hard for me to belleve that you have anything to do with Messrs Chalabi and Talabani.
And if your country does, I would like to suggest here, why not sell them?
Certainly nothing is lost or missed.
Sincerely Yours,
jouna
|
by jouna on 27.11.2005 [11:58 ]
|
|
|
LINK: www.kuna.net.kw/home/story.aspx?Language=en&DSNO=791176
|
by Yasis on 27.11.2005 [12:23 ]
|
|
|
If the U.S. imperialists and their running dogs dares to push Iran to the brink regarding its nuclear program, Iran should follow the example of DPRK and withdraw from the NPT and openly develop nuclear weapons.
USA only dares to touch defenceless countries. A country that can retaliate with nuclear weapons on the USA is safe. North Korea has showed us an example.
|
by jouna on 29.11.2005 [02:36 ]
|
|
|
LINK: www.interfax.ru/e/B/politics/28.html?id_issue=11427061
QUOTE: ‘ Iranian Foreign Minister Manuchehr Motaki said Iran has the legitimate right to run a civilian nuclear program.’
OPINION (by jouna): This has been and still is my opinion, too. If my country has right to develop nuclear program (and it has), why wouldn’t they? Any claim contrary to this is irresponsible as long as Iran sticks to equal, just relations with other nations (as my country does). If it’s not impossible for us, why not them?
|
by jouna on 29.11.2005 [02:37 ]
|
|
|
LINK: www.iranmania.com/News/ArticleView/Default.asp?NewsCode=38192&NewsKind=Current%20Affairs
INFO: I‘ve my reasons to drop this item here, since it sure looks strange that the Czech Reb. is a member of the Coalition of the Killing.
|
|
RSS feed for articles and news
