|
|
US military deployment raises tensions in Gulf
By: Ali Khalil on: 02.02.2010 [12:14 ] (1133 reads)
|
(4694 bytes) [nc]
|
|
US military deployment raises tensions in Gulf
Gulf Cooperation Council states 'sandwiched' between Iran, US as prospects for war increase.
By Ali Khalil - DUBAI
US deployment of anti-missile defences off Iran's coast and in a number of its Gulf Arab neighbours is certain to fuel tensions in a strategic region that supplies a third of the world's oil, analysts say.
"This will make Iran more nervous," said Mustafa Alani, head of security research at the Dubai-based Gulf Research Centre.
To counter a perceived threat from a controversial Iranian nuclear programme and Tehran's advancing missile capabilities, Washington has said it is deploying anti-missile weapons systems in the region.
The move is unlikely to please Iran, which has already warned its Gulf Arab neighbours not to take part in US moves against the Islamic republic.
But Tehran is likely to take comfort from the announcement in Washington that a US military failed on Sunday to shoot down a ballistic missile in a test resembling an Iranian or North Korean strike.
The US administration is reportedly placing specialised ships with missile-targeting capabilities off Iran's coast, and anti-missile systems in at least four Gulf states — Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates.
Saudi Arabia has long had the Patriot missile defence system, while the UAE placed an order in 2008. Bahrain is also home to the US Navy Fifth fleet, Qatar hosts the US Central Command (CENTCOM) and Kuwait has a large US military base.
"Iranians will interpret this as an opening shot in the intensification of US military agenda," said Professor Anoush Ehteshami, Iran and Gulf expert at Durham University in Britain.
"Tehran will see this as America putting indirect pressure on Iran by extending the security umbrella over Iran's neighbours," he said. Iran "will not see this in a positive light."
The US administration has not publicly spoken about the reasons for the deployment.
But the New York Times quoted a senior administration official as saying that the moves were meant to deter Iran, and to reassure Israel, which is Tehran's regional arch-foe.
"Our first goal is to deter the Iranians," the unidentified official told the newspaper on Saturday.
"A second is to reassure the Arab states, so they don't feel they have to go nuclear themselves. But there is certainly an element of calming the Israelis as well," he was quoted as saying.
Speaking in Kuwait last week, Iranian parliament speaker Ali Larijani warned Arab states of the Gulf against permitting US military operations against Tehran from their territories.
He assured them that Tehran "does not want to inflict any harm on the GCC (Gulf Cooperation Council) states."
The US moves follow the failure of UN-led nuclear talks in Vienna between Iran and six major powers. Last month at the talks, Iran refused to forego its uranium enrichment, leaving itself open to international sanctions.
Tehran insists that its nuclear programme is peaceful, but there are suspicions in the West that it may also be working on a covert nuclear bomb.
"The GCC is sandwiched between Iran and the Americans," Alani complained.
Riad Kahwaji, the head of the Dubai-based Institute for Near East and Gulf Military Analysis, agreed that the move escalates regional tensions. "It reminds everyone that the option of war continues to stand," he said.
On Sunday, a radar malfunction was blamed for the failure of a US military test to intercept a ballistic missile resembling an Iranian or North Korean strike.
Washington is seeking to win over its allies to slap a fourth set of UN sanctions on Iran that would target Iran's elite Revolutionary Guards, which it believes controls the military aspect of Tehran's nuclear programme.
Alani said Washington is aiming to contain Iran's threat, if it were to act militarily, by limiting its missile capabilities.
"The only strategic asset for Iran is the Shahab (ballistic) missile system. The Americans have decided now to take this advantage out, through paralysing it with an anti-missile system in the region," he said.
General David Petraeus, head of CENTCOM which oversees US military operations stretching from the Gulf to Central Asia, said the accelerated deployment of missile systems included eight Patriot missile batteries, "two in each of four countries."
The United States was also keeping Aegis guided missile cruisers, equipped with advanced radar and anti-missile systems that can intercept medium-range missiles, on patrol in the Gulf at all times, according to Petraeus.
http://www.middle-east-online.com/english/?id=36967
by informatron- on 02.02.2010 [13:18 ]
|
|
|
Main objective is Iran and strangle China:
1. Saudi and Yemen have not agreed to stop the air attacks against the Houthies. USA special forces beefed up in Yemen. Saudi ground forces beefed up by Pakistan special forces.
2. Israel gearing up for attack on Lebanon and Gaza (again, to attenuate reactions against Iran attack)
3. Scramble of aramdas at Bab el Mindab, to choke the Red Sea (No Sudanese oil to China).
4. Kill Iran (No Iran oil to China - Clitary has as much already).
5. Turkey is up in arms against these developments (breaking ties with Israel).
6. Syria may keep quiet or be attacked by air.
7. Expect a Naval battle off the coast of Yemen. (Iran v/s SCUM)
Meanwhile, Iran will win in the end. This war will provoke the greatest uprising of the Arab and Moslem street, even though Saudi propaganda says Iranians are more dangerous than Israel.
I don't believe that Iran's SCUD missiles would be more effective than Saddam Hussiens SCUDs. But the Patriot Anti SCUD System was not effective either.
The damage and loss of life to everybody will be great. Lets hope it does not happen. Then the Zionist can be killed one by one, at home and abroad.
|
by cosmo on 02.02.2010 [13:18 ]
|
|
|
zio citystates of kuwait, bahrain, qatar, uae and ziosaudi all these missiles are there to try to shoot down Iranian missiles.
Once engaged then all these states are at war with Iran, there is no way to circumvent that fact and they should be pounded into oblivence.
Iran should be proactive and plan for the taking out all of these bases as early as possible and before they are activated in a conflict. The same applies to the zioidiotic duck fleet running along the shores of Iran and the Arabian sea.
The ziofrench airbase in the ziouae should receive the royal tresatment too.
All of this to protect the zioentity and nothing else and the Zombified Sheeple in the ziowest are in DEEP Hibernation.
|
by flashball2 on 02.02.2010 [13:23 ]
|
|
|
There will not be war at all, I can guarantee you.
|
by informatron- on 02.02.2010 [13:24 ]
|
|
|
Looks like an air war on several fronts in weeks rather than months
Main objective is Iran and by product strangle China:
1. Saudi and Yemen have not agreed to stop air attacks against Houthies. USA special forces beefed up in Yemen. Saudi ground forces beefed up by Pakistan special forces.
2. Israel gearing up for attack on Lebanon and Gaza (again, to attenuate possible reactions against Iran attack)
3. Scramble of aramdas at Bab el Mindab, to choke the Red Sea (No Sudanese oil to China).
4. Kill Iran (No Iran oil to China - Clitary has as much already).
5. Turkey is up in arms against these war developments (breaking ties with Israel).
6. Syria may keep quiet if not it will be attacked by air.
7. Naval battle off the coast of Yemen. (Iran v/s SCUM)
Iran will win. This war will provoke the greatest uprising of the Arab and Moslem street, even though Saudi propaganda says Iranians are more dangerous than Israel.
I don't believe that Iran's SCUD missiles would be more effective than Saddam Hussiens SCUDs. But the Patriot Anti SCUD System is not effective either.
The damage and loss of life to everybody will be great. Lets hope it does not happen, then the Zionists will defeated at home and killed one by one abroad.
|
by informatron- on 02.02.2010 [13:28 ]
|
|
|
:-O
|
by ILYANA_ROZUMOVA on 02.02.2010 [14:16 ]
|
|
|
Murder murder murder murder.
War war war war war war war.
That is all they can do good.
Can’t make good cars. Can’t grow good food. Can’t do good deeds at all.
Christians? Did they never hear what my Lord said unto them?
If you live by the sword, you will die by the sword!
|
by pilot-x on 02.02.2010 [14:46 ]
|
|
|
Operation P and Q
Peace
and
Quiet
|
by Kamau_Ajamu on 02.02.2010 [14:55 ]
|
|
|
...Amen!!!
|
by informatron- on 02.02.2010 [18:50 ]
|
|
|
The bombs of Najaf and Karbala: Who would have thought Moslems could do jobs like that? Well I got the answer when that " Whabi Imam" of the grand mosque of Riadh declared that all Shia were pagans (to make it ok to kill Houthis). And now, I learn that it was the same argument that the Whahabi used to attack the Moslem Ottomon Caliphat on the side of the British.
|
by informatron- on 02.02.2010 [19:02 ]
|
|
|
h ttp://www.youtube.com/user/2sinbad626#p/u/5/Mmi147wLVGc
|
by Iron_Clay on 02.02.2010 [20:52 ]
|
|
|
US attacked Saddam just after China and Iraq made oil agreements outside the US$.
Although I do not believe Iran will have any form of win out of this attack.
Iran is about to be destroyed ... is my opinion ... there is no way Iran can withstand the might of US, UK, Israeli, and French all banging away for weeks on end.
I still believe Israel will make a dummy strike to the north to draw UK and US defense to their north and while the world watched that interplay, Israel will make the attack against Iran using Saudi air space.
France has clearly said it will be in to protect it's oil supply and is not a friend to Iran.
I expect to see a totally blackened Iran much worse than Iraq ever saw.
The only places not blackened by US and IS nuclear bombs will be the oil fields.
I've heard the claim of the likes of 'flashball2' and don't believe them on the evidence seen so far.
Neal
|
by kalashnikov on 02.02.2010 [21:10 ]
|
|
|
Palestinian proverb:
"Those who plunder others always live in terror."
|
by informatron- on 02.02.2010 [22:32 ]
|
|
|
kalashnikov
much better than informatron
|
by kalashnikov on 03.02.2010 [03:31 ]
|
|
|
In the photo above, we see the ugly Yank Nazis pulling ordnance down the runway.
Sooner or later, that runway will be directed at them.
|
by svoboda on 03.02.2010 [04:08 ]
|
|
|
My Saudi friends have been telling me for years that the only thing stopping an uprising against the phony "King" is the fact there are thousands of family members he has placed in all positions of importance in the country. However, this may be his undoing, because about half of those family members are just as opposed to his autocratic rule as the rest of the populace. Saudis need an uprising, very soon!
|
by Lima-P on 03.02.2010 [06:35 ]
|
|
|
surprising to say the least. How come you think so highly of west military tricks? And how do you compare Iran and Iraq, the latter bloodless after 12 years of sanctions before it was attacked? Or perhaps the greenies in Iran's so-called street opposition impressed you? Maybe you just got carried away at the thought of more Muslim blood being spilt in the streets of Tehran and othr cities.
|
by Iranian-Shi'ite on 04.02.2010 [15:04 ]
|
|
|
The US can make air strikes for 10+ years against Iran like it did against Iraq.
That won't cause regime change though.
While the US is bombing, Iran will increase its support to Hizbollah, Hamas, and specific resistance groups in Iraq and Afghanistan while possibly also targetting US bases in Central Asia and the Middle East with assymetric commando type attacks..
Iran will get the worst of it, as some pro-US pundits are sure to point out, but if the US wants regime change, at some point it will have to invade with ground forces like the US did with Iraq.
Now, Iran has three times the population of Iraq.
Iran doesn't have a huge ethnic / religious split like Iraq has.
Iran has much tougher terrain than Iraq (very mountainous in many regions).
Most importantly, Iraq prepared for a US land invasion for 10+ years.
Iran has been preparing for a US land invasion for 20+ years.
|
by Iranian-Shi'ite on 04.02.2010 [15:06 ]
|
|
|
If the US does initiate air strikes, it will inevitably be sucked into a ground war eventually.
There is no way to swim out of that maelstrom.
|
by Syrian on 04.02.2010 [16:36 ]
|
|
|
I'm really hoping that they would attack Iran. It would be the end of them all.
Make no mistake. Iran will win, Iranian generals are literally ITCHING to get into this war. They've positioned their navy around the suez canal, very far from home. If America starts anything, they'll shut down the west. With the Suez canal and the Gulf closed for business, no more Oil shipments will be made to europe and the world.
Meanwhile you can say goodbye to all the military bases of the west around the middle east. They will be struck by long range Shahab-1, Shahab-2 and Shahab-3 missiles. If the Americans decide to use WMDs as well, they might face an unexpected factor.
They're not going to strike Iran, lol. They're finished, almost $4,000,000,000,000.00 budget their economy is dying and fighting with Iran will seal the deal. Both economically and militarily.
Checkmate.
|
by Syrian on 04.02.2010 [16:37 ]
|
|
|
Its quite likely they're going to start a war on Lebanon NOT Iran. If anything, they're positioning themselves just in case Iran gets involved.
|
by eureka on 04.02.2010 [17:14 ]
|
|
|
I wouldn't like to see any escalation of war in the middle east, but if America strikes Iran then I hope that the Iranians would give them a real ass-kicking. It is high time that America gets the message that they don't own the middle east or the rest of the world for that matter.
From my limited knowledge of Iran, I know that they are not stupid and have some carefully laid plans for such an eventuality. The important thing to remember is: that even Iraq that didn't have any defensive weapons did not surrender to the shock and awe bombing they received from america and if those clowns in washington have any common sense, they should recognize that Iran is no easy push-over.
|
by eureka on 04.02.2010 [17:18 ]
|
|
|
the current friction between China and US, over the sale of weapons to Taiwan. China is hopping mad with the US over this issue, among others and they could be the dark horse in any attack on Iran by US.
|
by gmmonko on 05.02.2010 [03:14 ]
|
|
|
The attacking of the US forces in Iraq by the estimated 2 million Shiite militias could change the game a little bit in favor of Iran.
But the major threat sits in the Gulf on US air carriers: 5000 cruise missiles. If Iran can take this out and Pakistani Shiites would get a hand on nukes and destroy Diego Garcia the US military can be defeated. Only an orchestrated operation can take out the US.
|
by kalashnikov on 05.02.2010 [04:56 ]
|
|
|
USA DELENDA EST!
|
by Iranian-Shi'ite on 05.02.2010 [09:01 ]
|
|
|
This world is different now than it was when the USA began its systematic slaughter of Iraq.
Russia and China are in a stronger position now than they were 19 or 20 years ago.
Indeed, they are in a noticeably stronger position now than just five years ago.
|
|